 |
- Governance & Sustainability
|
| |
 |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| |
Assurance report on sustainable development
aspects |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
Independent assurance provider’s report to
the directors of Exxaro Resources Limited on sustainable
development performance information included in the 2007
annual report |
| |
We have been engaged by Exxaro Resources Limited (Exxaro)
to provide independent assurance over selected sustainable
development (SD) performance information included in
its annual report (the “report”) for the
year ended 31 December 2007.
This report is made solely to Exxaro in accordance
with the terms of our engagement. Our work has been
undertaken so that we might state to Exxaro those matters
we have been engaged to state in this report and for
no other purpose. We do not accept or assume responsibility
to anyone other than Exxaro, for our work, for this
report, or for the conclusions we have reached. |
| The objective of our independent assurance engagement
was to express reasonable assurance on the number of
fatalities(read more)
and limited assurance on: |
- SD Performance indicators: Lost time injury
frequency rate (LTIFR) by employee and contractor (read more);
Level 1 and Level 2 environmental incidents (read
more);
carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (read
more);
total energy use (read
more);
water used for primary activities
(read more);
- Qualitative disclosures relating to the: implementation
of the HIV/Aids policy (read
more) and
application of Exxaro’s criteria for community
investments (read more);
and
- Management’s assertions relating to
compliance with the nine elements of the mining charter
(the “mining charter”) (read
more).
|
| |
The internally developed Exxaro SD reporting guidance
as presented on the Exxaro website was used as criteria
for the selected SD performance indicators.
Our engagement relates only to the 2007 SD performance
information in the report and does not extend to any
prior year SD performance information and disclosures
or assertions relating to future SD performance plans/
strategies in the report.
The report (read
more and read
more) sets
out the evolving nature of Exxaro’s sustainable
development as a result of the integration of new operations
into the group affecting the standardisation of data
collection and analysis for meaningful reporting purposes.
It is important to understand the reliability of the
2007 SD performance information in the context of these
limitations.
Responsibilities of directors
The directors of Exxaro are responsible for the preparation
and presentation of the report and the information and
assertions contained within it, for determining the Group’s
objectives in respect of SD performance, including the
identification of stakeholders and material issues, and
for establishing and maintaining appropriate performance
management and internal control systems from which the
reported SD performance information is derived.
Responsibility of the independent assurance provider
Our responsibility is to express our conclusions to
Exxaro based on our work performed. We conducted our
work in accordance with the International Standard on
Assurance Engagements 3000: Assurance Engagements
other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Information. This
standard requires, inter alia, that the assurance provider
complies with the appropriate requirements of the IFAC
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants such that
their independence is not compromised and the assurance
team members collectively possesses the necessary professional
competencies. Our work was carried out by a multidisciplinary
team of safety, health, environmental, and assurance
specialists with extensive experience in sustainability
reporting in the mining sector.
Summary of work performed
Our procedures selected depend on our judgement, including
our assessment of the risk of material misstatements
of those 2007 selected SD performance indicators, disclosures
and management assertions and our assessment of the internal
controls relevant to the company’s preparation
and presentation of the sustainability information in
the report. Our procedures were designed to gather sufficient
appropriate evidence to determine that the 2007 selected
SD performance information is not materially misstated. |
| Our work performed included: |
- Interviews with management and senior executives
at corporate level and with management at business
unit level;
- Testing of process and systems in place at corporate
level and business unit level to generate, collate, aggregate,
monitor and report the SD performance indicators for
the year and to comply with requirements of the mining
charter;
- Visits to three business units including Arnot (coal),
KZN Sands (sands) and Rosh Pinah (base metals and industrial
minerals);
- Telephone interviews and analytical reviews of SD performance
indicators for business units not included in site visits;
and
- Consideration of other SD performance information in
the report to identify material inconsistencies with
evidence obtained from our assurance engagement.
|
| |
We believe that the evidence obtained from our work
performed provides an appropriate basis for our conclusions
expressed below. Where limited assurance is expressed,
less assurance is obtained from our procedures than in
a reasonable assurance engagement. We do not express
any assurance in relation to the 2007 performances indicators
not included above, further any reference to external
audits of SHE-related policies, standards and procedures
(read
more)
contained in the report have nothing to do with our independent
assurance engagement to report on the SD performance
indicators.
Unqualified conclusions |
| Number of fatalities, community investments, HIV/Aids
policy, and compliance with the mining charter Based
on our work performed, in our opinion: |
- 1. The number of fatalities are fairly stated
in all material respects in accordance with the internally
developed Exxaro SD reporting guidance; and
2.Nothing has come to our attention that causes us to
believe that the qualitative disclosures relating
to the application of Exxaro’s criteria for community
investments and implementation of the HIV/Aids policy,
in accordance with the internally developed Exxaro
SD reporting guidance, and management’s assertions
regarding compliance with the mining charter, are not
fairly stated in all material respects.
Modifications (Adverse conclusion and disclaimer
of conclusion) |
Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR), water
used for primary activities, and Level 1 and Level
2 environmental incidents
We were unable to reconcile the underlying source
data relating to these SD performance indicators to
the SD performance information in the report. There
are significant control weaknesses that prevent complete,
consistent and accurate reporting of SD performance
data in accordance with the internally developed Exxaro
SD reporting guidance. Based on our work performed,
these performance indicators are not fairly stated
in all material respects.
CO2 emissions and total energy use
The reported CO2 emissions are only from
diesel and electricity purchased, as disclosed on (read
more). We
were not able to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence
for reported CO2 emissions and total
energy use as the underlying source data relating
to these SD performance indicators was not available
and consequently we are unable to conclude on these performance
indicators.
Commentary |
| Without affecting our conclusions presented above, we
draw attention to the following: |
- The new approved SD strategy, discussed in the report,
is encouraging and should enable Exxaro to progress
beyond a minimum of legal compliance. Exxaro are reviewing
polices and reporting guidelines against the new SD
strategy prior to implementation. The implementation
of these policies and reporting guidelines are essential
for embedding the SD strategy and for reliable reporting
of SD performance information across the group.
- The process of fully integrating the ex-Eyesizwe sites
is proceeding and as discussed in the report, the alignment
of these sites with uniform policies, processes and systems
of the Exxaro group is essential to ensure reliable reporting
of the group’s SD performance information.
- A more comprehensive stakeholder engagement should
be undertaken during the coming year to strengthen the
sustainability risk management process and allow Exxaro
to respond proactively to its stakeholders when reporting
on its SD performance.
|
| |
We recommend that Exxaro monitor these developments
and integration processes and disclose the results in
future sustainability reports or other forms of communication. |
| KPMG SERVICES (PTY) LIMITED |
| |
 |
Per PD NAIDOO
Director |
| |
Johannesburg
13 March 2008 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
| www.aiccafrica.org |
| |
| www.africagrowth.net |
| |
AICC statement
AICC was requested by Exxaro Resources Limited to
facilitate a multistakeholder panel to review the development
of the 2007 Sustainable Development (SD) report which
forms part of the 2007 annual report. This statement
deals exclusively with the stakeholder engagement process
and not the content of the report.
The panel was selected based on the issues in the report.
In their broad categories these issues were: environment,
health and safety, black economic empowerment, local
economic development and governance. AICC identified
10 panelists from the academic, consulting, corporate
and the NGO sector. In addition, AICC engaged three experts
on governance, health, safety and environment (HSE),
black economic empowerment (BEE) and local economic development
(LED) to provide insights and questions for the panelists
to consider during the review process.
The review process, divided into three phases, focused
firstly on the review of the issues matrix submitted
by Exxaro. Panelists commented on whether Exxaro had
identified all the material issues linked to its business.
The views were provided to Exxaro to inform the data
collection.
The second phase focused on the review of the draft
report, examining how Exxaro accounted for the material
issues identified. Attention was given to the responsiveness
of Exxaro to stakeholder issues, the completeness of
the information and how it was being communicated. Gaps
were highlighted by the panelists and sent to Exxaro.
These gaps related to governance, environmental and BEE
issues relating to performance and targets.
AICC compiled the comments from the panel and submitted
them to Exxaro. Exxaro has indicated that the comments
have informed the development of the 2007 report and,
more importantly, the strategy for reporting on performance
in 2008 and beyond.
The third phase focused on discussing the first proof
of the report. Unfortunately, due to unexpected delays,
panelists did not have time to evaluate the report and
establish how the gaps had been addressed. As a result
AICC is unable to provide an opinion on the final report.
AICC appreciates the opportunity to keep strengthening
stakeholder engagement in the mining sector. AICC recommends
that Exxaro Resources Limited address the gaps identified
by the panel and continue to engage with the panel of
experts on issues of sustainability. |
| |
PAUL KAPELUS
Director |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|